Artifact · v0 (real content)

Stakeholder Map

Who has a stake in the self-funded vs. scaled decision, what they care about, and how their concerns affect the options you can credibly choose. Built from the call and the public record, not from assumptions.

1.1 · Founder Alignment Lead · artifact id: stakeholder-map-v0.html · 2026-05-28 · v0 draft
Sourcing note. This map draws only on what was said on the May 15 call, plus the public record. Family members are described by role and relationship, not by name beyond the founders. The map does not speculate about anyone's personal views; it names the structural interests each stakeholder category represents.

How to read this map

Every significant company decision has stakeholders beyond the founders: people and groups whose interests are affected by the outcome, who can influence the decision, or who can block it if their concerns are ignored. The alignment decision (self-funded vs. scaled) touches four stakeholder groups. Understanding what each group cares about helps the founders anticipate which version of either path will actually work.

Group 1: The founders

Habib Hassim · Co-founder

Habib

Built SmartOne from a call center in Madagascar to a Physical AI data firm over 14 years. Architect of the technology layer aspiration (platform, open-source tooling, Physical AI pivot). Investor-minded: described Physical Intelligence's Ali Amin as a warm connection and referenced the Scale AI conflict window as an opportunity. His instinct is to add a technology layer, build optionality, and take the business somewhere a pure services firm cannot go.

Stated interests
  • Building a platform layer on top of the services business
  • Capturing the Physical AI market opportunity at speed
  • Optionality: raise, strategic partner, or stay independent
  • The technology stack is personally interesting, not just commercially logical
What the alignment session needs from him

An honest answer to: what is the company he wants to run, versus the company he wants to have built? Those are sometimes different answers, and both are valid, but they lead to different paths.

Shahysta Hassim · CEO

Shahysta

Returned as CEO in January 2026 with one mandate: secure revenue as fast as possible. Has been inside the Amazon relationship for years and named it as the company's biggest blind spot. Her instinct is to protect the Madagascar workforce and preserve the human-in-the-loop model that has always been SmartOne's core. Operationally clear-eyed: she diagnosed the articulation gap, the annual commitment problem, and the European growth opportunity all on one call.

Stated interests
  • Revenue stability: getting off survival-mode as fast as possible
  • Madagascar workforce protection: the 1,000 employees who have built the company
  • European growth: she sees the ICP convergence clearly and SmartOne already has team presence in France
  • Finding operators who actually fit SmartOne's culture (two failed hires are a real data point)
What the alignment session needs from her

An honest answer to: what does "secure revenue" look like when it is done, and what does she do next? The mandate she came back with is a short-run mandate; the alignment session is where she extends it or replaces it.

Group 2: Founders' personal capital and reputational exposure

Bootstrapped founders as capital provider and reputational backstop

SmartOne is described in the corpus as a bootstrapped business. No VC investors, no outside equity. The founders have carried the financial and reputational exposure for 14 years. That relationship creates two distinct interests: the founders as capital providers (who bear the financial risk) and the founders as individuals whose personal identity and reputations are intertwined with the company's trajectory.

Structural interests
  • As capital providers: return on 14 years of patient, self-funded growth. What does "good" look like financially for the people who have carried this?
  • As individuals: SmartOne's story (a bootstrapped company built in Madagascar by a Malagasy-rooted founding team, now headquartered in Montreal) is a meaningful personal narrative. A decision that significantly changes the ownership or control structure affects that story.
  • Decision velocity: founders who have operated without outside investors may have different decision rhythms than VC-backed founders. "Can we decide this in a week?" depends on how the two founders align personally, not on an investor board.
The alignment session question for this group. Before choosing Path B (raise capital), the founders need to know: does the personal and financial exposure they have carried to date change the trade-off calculation between dilutive VC and continued self-direction? The answer is personal, not financial.

Group 3: The Madagascar workforce

1,000 full-time employees · Site Director: Jeritiana Ravelojaona

The Madagascar operation is not a commodity workforce. These are full-time employees who have built institutional knowledge in annotation over 5-10 years on average. Jeritiana Ravelojaona leads the site and is the architect of the SOC 2 Type II and ISO 27001 compliance posture. The team can ramp 50% in two weeks while maintaining quality. They are, in the framing from the call, the thing worth protecting.

Structural interests
  • Employment continuity: for most of these employees, this is a primary or sole household income
  • The AI augmentation question: if the platform vision automates annotation tasks, what happens to the people currently doing those tasks? This question is not hypothetical; it is the Org Design memo question (Phase 2 role 2.2)
  • Quality and culture: the accuracy discipline and SOC 2 posture were built by this team. Rapid headcount changes (up or down) risk that culture
The business case for protecting this group. The institutional workforce is SmartOne's primary competitive differentiator. Dismantling it for short-term margin improvement destroys the thing that makes SmartOne worth buying or partnering with. Protecting it is not only an ethical commitment; it is a business strategy.

Group 4: Key accounts and near-term relationships

Amazon · Anchor client

~60% of SmartOne's revenue. Amazon's behavior (how much it spends, whether it expands or contracts the relationship) has more impact on SmartOne's planning horizon than any other single factor. Amazon has shaped how the founders see the entire market for two years. The alignment decision affects how much further that concentration is allowed to grow.

Interest

Continuity and quality at current engagement terms. Amazon's procurement teams are unlikely to care about SmartOne's strategic direction unless a quality or security issue arises. The risk is not that Amazon will be offended by SmartOne's growth strategy; it is that Amazon remains the dominant anchor and the concentration risk is never resolved.

Robotics pilot client · Unnamed

The single largest near-term revenue event. A 300-person ramp for one unnamed robotics client. If it signs and runs for 12 months at a committed annual rate, it could by itself exit SmartOne from survival mode. This relationship is the most important short-term stakeholder outside the founders. Every Phase 1 decision that delays the robotics deal is a decision that extends survival mode.

Interest

Quality delivery on the pilot. Their interest is that SmartOne delivers what it promised. SmartOne's interest is converting the pilot to an annual commitment. The pricing model spec is the tool for that conversion.

Physical Intelligence · Ali Amin connection

Ali Amin at Physical Intelligence was named on the May 15 call as a warm, live connection. Physical Intelligence raised $600M at $5.6B valuation and is an active buyer of Physical AI data services; Scale AI publicly names them as a client with 100,000+ production hours completed. SmartOne is positioned to compete for that relationship in the Scale AI conflict window.

Interest

A reliable, conflict-free data partner at physical world annotation scale. The warm connection is real. The activation requires SmartOne to have a named Physical AI service offering and case study package ready before the outreach.

Safran · Current French client

The existing warm path for European growth. SmartOne already works with Safran today (confirmed on the May 15 call). Safran.AI is actively expanding. Converting the current ad hoc relationship to a framework agreement is the Phase 2 move with the lowest prerequisite cost and the clearest credential for other French defense primes.

Interest

A qualified data partner for French defense programs. The interest is mutual: Safran needs annotation partners who can handle sensitive aerospace and defense data at scale; SmartOne has done it and passed their quality bar already.

Stakeholder summary matrix

Stakeholder Path A (self-funded) Path B (raised capital) Key concern to address
Habib Lower speed on technology layer; full control Capital to accelerate platform; dilution What company does he want to run day-to-day?
Shahysta More control over workforce; revenue still constrained Board pressure on workforce; more resources for sales What does "secure revenue" look like when it's done?
Family (as capital) No dilution; patient capital continues Dilution; new investors in governance conversation Is family capital available for growth injection if needed?
Madagascar workforce Slower change; employment more predictable Augmentation question becomes urgent sooner What is the explicit commitment to employment continuity?
Amazon Concentration risk continues Faster diversification away from anchor dependency SmartOne's dependence on Amazon, not Amazon's on SmartOne
Robotics pilot Neutral; quality delivery is what matters Neutral; quality delivery is what matters Convert pilot to annual commitment using pricing model spec